Journal & Article

Psychology, Applied

I/F
# Journal I/F

Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice

Does the antiwork perspective contribute to understanding and improving the nature of work? What is work to you? Empowering workers and changing perspectives Estranged, nauseated, or fulfilled? Existentialism as bridge between antiwork and I-O psychology The role of work psychologists in the development of antiwork sentiments From antiwork to disorganizational psychology Antiwork highlights the need for humanism in I-O psychology Addressing antiwork concerns through nonwork identity: Beyond an emphasis on meaningful work Working against the current: What different groups can teach us about antiwork Antiwork or antimaster? Reframing the antiwork movement through a racial lens One opportunity of antiwork: Bringing unions (back) to the I-O table Entrepreneurship: an extension to anti-work perspectives A tale of two antiworks The science of weight controllability: Implications and future directions for weight at work research The weight of beauty in psychological research Organizational research on weight stigma must center targets’ perspectives Acknowledging the ramifications of weight-based stereotype threat in the workplace Importance of considering intersectionality when studying weight at work Twinks, jocks, and bears—oh my! The stereotype content model extended to gay men and weight at work Beneficial role of mindfulness interventions in reducing weight stigma Becoming and acting as an ally against weight-based discrimination Beyond rating accuracy: unpacking frame-of-reference assessor training effectiveness Any slice is predictive? On the consistency of impressions from the beginning, middle, and end of assessment center exercises and their relation to performance Perceptions of assessment center exercises: between exercises differences and interventions An epistemology for assessment and development: how do we know what we know? Making the volunteer journey a better one with I-O psychology knowledge. IOP volunteerism: Acting as individuals, acting as a community. The bright and dark side of I-O psychologists and volunteer work. "Can't you see I'm burned out!": An exploration of potential downsides of volunteering. Career days: Dipping your toe in I-O volunteerism. Best practices, pro bono : Volunteering for early career I-O psychologists. Enhancing graduate student education through meaningful volunteer efforts. "Helping us by helping you": Pro bono consulting and graduate student training. Engaging graduate students in nonprofit consulting experiences. How well are we doing at addressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in the science and practice of I-O psychology? Reflections on the SIOP 2023 conference. Moving the boundaries of I-O, or of work itself ? Strengthening the link between I-O psychology and the SDGs: Providing support for the next generation. Humanitarianism and the UN sustainable developmental goals are insufficient: The case for a humanistic industrial-organizational psychology. We can be more, but first, who are we? To engage with the UN SDGs, the "how" is just as important as the "what": A case for engagement with the aid-effectiveness framework. POSH, plus nonvisible disabilities. Finding "work" in grand challenges: Lessons from extremism research and a call to action. Earning our place: How we can use interdisciplinary collaborations to move forward with sustainable development goals. Employee response to employer-sponsored direct primary care. Rumors of general mental ability's demise are the next red herring. Revisiting predictor–criterion construct congruence: Implications for designing personnel selection systems. Ideal solutions don't necessarily inform reality. Is it also time to revisit situational specificity? To correct or not to correct for range restriction, that is the question: Looking back and ahead to move forward. Hocus-pocus and hydraulics functions: Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well. Interpreting the magnitude of predictor effect sizes: It is time for more sensible benchmarks.